Supporting information

RSPCA views

The RSPCA is concerned with the welfare of all wild animals and it deplores man-made changes in the environment that cause suffering to wild animals.

The RSPCA’s concern is with the suffering of individual animals and not the conservation of species. Species themselves do not suffer, although where a species is in decline, individuals may suffer particular welfare harm as a consequence. In most cases, conservation and welfare arguments coincide in supporting similar actions. Where they diverge, however, the RSPCA will question the ethical and factual premises of the conservation argument and press the case for welfare.

The Society believes humankind must accept responsibility for the consequences following the introduction of species into environments where they are non-native. It challenges, on a case-by-case basis, the activity of deliberate introductions, and feels that where this is being considered, those responsible should pay regard to possible future outcomes that may affect native species, and be prepared to take responsibility for consequential problems. The Society treats the suffering of all animals equally. It is not the fault of the animals themselves if they are relocated due to human action. Where possible we advocate solutions that place animal welfare considerations, for both the alien species and any affected native species, above conservation goals.